<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Micing Clarinet for Live Applications</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jazz-clarinet.com/2010/06/15/micing-clarinet-for-live-applications/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jazz-clarinet.com/2010/06/15/micing-clarinet-for-live-applications/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=micing-clarinet-for-live-applications</link>
	<description>Jazz-Clarinet, all things Jazz and Clarinet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 23:41:04 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: grd</title>
		<link>http://www.jazz-clarinet.com/2010/06/15/micing-clarinet-for-live-applications/comment-page-1/#comment-3616</link>
		<dc:creator>grd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 14:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jazz-clarinet.com/?p=212#comment-3616</guid>
		<description>The problem with amplifying clarinet is that the sound comes out in many directions, the fingerholes and the bell, and different notes project from different places.  Therefore, a single microphone is not a great solution in live situations.   Depending on the volume of the particular situation you are playing in, I have found two different approaches that work well.  AMT, Applied Microphone Technology, makes excellent double mics on ultra-lite goosenecks which clip on to your bell and suspend a mic under your bell and above the fingerholes.  They are not cheap, but of the highest quality.  See http://www.appliedmicrophone.com/products/show/18  

If you are playing in high volume situations where feedback can be a problem, a mic which is installed on the barrel is a good solution.  No feedback, decent sound which you can alter with electronics, if you are into that.  See the PT100PV on this page- I have found this to be a quality product:  http://gtc-music1.com/store/index.php

Either of these solutions can be wireless.  I have used them both.  I use the barrel solution most lately because I don&#039;t have to worry about feedback.

Good luck,
Glenn</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with amplifying clarinet is that the sound comes out in many directions, the fingerholes and the bell, and different notes project from different places.  Therefore, a single microphone is not a great solution in live situations.   Depending on the volume of the particular situation you are playing in, I have found two different approaches that work well.  AMT, Applied Microphone Technology, makes excellent double mics on ultra-lite goosenecks which clip on to your bell and suspend a mic under your bell and above the fingerholes.  They are not cheap, but of the highest quality.  See <a href="http://www.appliedmicrophone.com/products/show/18" rel="nofollow">http://www.appliedmicrophone.com/products/show/18</a>  </p>
<p>If you are playing in high volume situations where feedback can be a problem, a mic which is installed on the barrel is a good solution.  No feedback, decent sound which you can alter with electronics, if you are into that.  See the PT100PV on this page- I have found this to be a quality product:  <a href="http://gtc-music1.com/store/index.php" rel="nofollow">http://gtc-music1.com/store/index.php</a></p>
<p>Either of these solutions can be wireless.  I have used them both.  I use the barrel solution most lately because I don&#8217;t have to worry about feedback.</p>
<p>Good luck,<br />
Glenn</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

